On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> and hash_32_generic() is just __hash_32() with zero shift. > > Right. But that __hash_32() is very expensive and doesn't help. > > So the patch as-is doesn't seem to buy anything, and only adds cost. But my patch doesn't add any __hash_32() call. It was already there. Anyway, I'll drop the patch. Thanks, Amir.
