On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 11:10 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> For a brief moment I pondered whether it would make sense to make
> filesystems part of the device model so that the suspend code could work
> out fs <-> bdev dependencies and know in which order to freeze
> filesystems and quiesce devices, but every time I go digging into how
> all those macros work I get confused and my eyes glaze over, so I don't
> know if this is at all a good idea or just confused ramblings.
If we have to go this way: shouldn't we introduce a new abstraction
("storage stack element" or similar) rather than making filesystems part of
the device model?
Thanks,
Bart.
