Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use crc ^ cp_ver instead of crc | cp_ver for recovery

To: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Yuchao (T)" <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use crc ^ cp_ver instead of crc | cp_ver for recovery
From: Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 22:30:51 +0800
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxx>, heyunlei <heyunlei@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 932862178E
In-reply-to: <84228ad0-b71c-dc49-5326-80e98d15ddd1@kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2

> We can use this calculation since cp_ver is complete 64-bits random number now.

Sorry, I meant we can't.

Thanks,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use crc ^ cp_ver instead of crc | cp_ver for recovery
  - From: Gao Xiang

References:
- [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use crc ^ cp_ver instead of crc | cp_ver for recovery
  - From: Gaoxiang (OS)
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use crc ^ cp_ver instead of crc | cp_ver for recovery
  - From: Chao Yu
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use crc ^ cp_ver instead of crc | cp_ver for recovery
  - From: Gao Xiang
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use crc ^ cp_ver instead of crc | cp_ver for recovery
  - From: Gao Xiang
- Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use crc ^ cp_ver instead of crc | cp_ver for recovery
  - From: Chao Yu