On 01/26/2018 11:09 AM, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
On 26 Jan 2018, at 10.54, Matias Bjørling <mb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I _really_ hope that we can sit down and align OCSSD 2.X since it really
makes no sense to have different flavours of the same thing in the
wild...
Yes, makes no sense to have different flavours. I'm only asking to
please keep the OCSSD 2.0 specification and the workgroup processes
separate. Even if the workgroup bases its work on OCSSD 2.0, it does not
mean in the end it will be OCSSD compatible. When the workgroup has been
formed and is ready to share a draft or final work, then we can discuss
if there is a need to make it compatible and if it merges well.
