* Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Did anyone else notice the > > [ 31.068198] ? vmalloc_sync_all+0x150/0x150 > > present in a bunch of the stack traces? That should be pretty uncommon. I thikn that's pretty unusual: > Is it just part of the normal do_page_fault() stack and the stack > dumper picks up on it? No, it should only be called by register_die_notifier(), which is not part of the regular stack dump, AFAICS. Thanks, Ingo