On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:49:04PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:48:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Ok, fair enough. Given that the old version gets obsoleted by this > > one, it shouldn't get much uglier than it already is here when you > > start out with a regular timespec. We just need to be aware of possible > > clashes when we get the patches merged at the same time. > > I still hope to get this into 4.15. If it gets delayed and we > have a coherent 64-bit time_t abi around already I can reconsider > the decision. s/4.15/4.16/ of course.
