On Jan 25, 2008 12:29 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > | + /* is this correct? */ > > | + if (sbi->s_anchor[2] != 0) > > | + seq_printf(seq, ",anchor=%u", sbi->s_anchor[2]); > > > > you know, I would prefer to use form UDF_SB_ANCHOR(sb)[2] > > in sake of style unification but we should wait for Jan's > > decision (i'm not the expert in this area ;) > > I think UDF_SB_ANCHOR macro was removed by some patch in -mm. > > I'm more interested if the second element of the s_anchor array really > does always have the value of the 'anchor=N' mount option. I haven't > been able to verify that fully. Do you have some insight into that? > > Thanks, > Miklos > Miklos, I'll check this today evening (a bit busy now). - Cyrill - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
