On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:39:14 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There is value in using the c:func syntax, as it will generate > > cross-references to the kerneldoc comments for those functions. In this > > case, it would appear that these comments exist, but nobody has pulled > > them into the docs yet. I took the liberty of adding :c:func: references > > to this patch on its way into docs-next so that things will Just Work on > > that happy day when somebody adds the function documentation. > > Is this the sort of thing that might result in that happy day? > I didn't spend tooo much time on it, in case including the > kernel-doc in credentials.rst like this was the wrong direction. >From a very quick look, yes. I'll take a closer look soon. Life has been a bit ... busy ... around here... Thanks, jon
