On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 13:57 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > My usual algorithm here is to > > 1: queue all the patches and send the ones which have a maintainer to > that maintainer until he merges it. > > 2: If the patches have a dependency upon (say) a VFS patch then I'll > merge the VFS patch and will then goto 1. > > I don't think this particular patch has a VFS depencency so sure, merge > away. You'll probably see that I merged it anyway, but I'll drop it again > when I see it turn up in your tree (I used to resync with the git trees > at least daily, but I now do this far less frequently because it is such > torture because everyone is paddling in everyone else's puddle). Merged. Thanks. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
