Both are OK, since nid < root_ino cannot trigger segmentation fault
(nat_block->entries[nid%NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK]).
On 2017/12/23 11:14, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2017/12/18 19:53, Yunlong Song wrote:
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx>
How about introducing IS_AVAILABLE_NID as below, and use it instead?
#define IS_AVAILABLE_NID(sbi, nid) (IS_VALID_NID(sbi, nid) && (nid >= root_ino))
Thanks,
---
fsck/fsck.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fsck/fsck.c b/fsck/fsck.c
index 11b8b0b..faf0663 100644
--- a/fsck/fsck.c
+++ b/fsck/fsck.c
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ void fsck_chk_inode_blk(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, u32 nid,
for (idx = 0; idx < 5; idx++) {
u32 nid = le32_to_cpu(node_blk->i.i_nid[idx]);
- if (nid != 0) {
+ if (nid != 0 && IS_VALID_NID(sbi, nid)) {
struct node_info ni;
get_node_info(sbi, nid, &ni);
.
--
Thanks,
Yunlong Song
