On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 07:14:22AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:58:52 +0100 > Adam Borowski <kilobyte@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This link is replicated in most filesystems' config stanzas. Referring > > to an archived version of that site is pointless as it mostly deals with > > patches; user documentation is available elsewhere. > > --- > > No changes, acks added (Dave Kleikamp's came without CCs). > > > > Acked: btrfs ceph cifs ext2 f2fs jfs xfs. > > No ack: . 9p ext4 hfsplus jffs2 reiserfs -- but there's no point in caring > > this much for a trivial doc update, molesting the maintainers further is a > > waste of their time. > > So how would you like this to go upstream? I can certainly take it > through docs, but it seems like vfs might be the first choice...? Good question. I submitted it in one piece, to reduce spam (plenty of mostly two-line changes to elebenty filesystems' prose), and no one pays me per-commit, but splitting Documentation/ from fs/*/Kbuild might be reasonable. Al: would you prefer to take it as a single commit, as Doc + fs, or chopped into tiny bits? [Dropped the CCs to not waste everyone else's time.] Meow! -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.
