Re: [PATCH v2] fs: handle shrinker registration failure in sget_userns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 08:59:22PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 23-11-17 14:55:40, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:35:37PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > Hopefully less screwed version.  But as I've said I am not really
> > > > familiar with the code and do not feel competent to change it so please
> > > > be very careful here. I've moved the shrinker registration to
> > > > alloc_super which turned out to be simpler.
> > > 
> > > I don't get it.  Why the hell do we need all that PITA in the first place?
> > > Just make sget_userns() end with
> > > 	if (unlikely(regsiter_shrinker(&s->s_shrink) != 0)) {
> > > 		deactivate_locked_super(s);
> > > 		s = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > 	}
> > > 	return s;
> > > and be done with that.  All there is to it...
> > 
> > Al, do you plan to push this fix? Tetsuo's unregister_shrinker
> > fortification is already in the mmotm tree.
> 
> Is it in any git branch I could pull from?  Or I could just throw it
> into vfs.git#for-linus before the fix above - up to you, folks...

Actually, looking at mmotm...  I don't see it there.  Which patch
is it in?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux