Re: False lockdep completion splats with loop device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Let me ask a potentially stupid question, Can someone give an example
of the problem this completion lockdep is actually trying to *catch*.
The lockdep message is sufficiently confusing it's not even clear what
*good* it is in the first place.

Is there an example of a bug that this lockdep feature hasf actually
caught in real life, as opposed to false positives?

							- Ted



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux