Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Al Boldi wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> > Running fsync in data=ordered means that all of the dirty blocks on the
> > FS will get written before fsync returns.
>
> Hm, that's strange, I expected this kind of behaviour from data=journal.
>
> data=writeback should return immediatly, which seems it does, but
> data=ordered should only wait for metadata flush, it shouldn't wait for
> filedata flush.  Are you sure it waits for both?

I over simplified.  data=ordered means that all data blocks are written before 
the metadata that references them commits.

So, if you add 1GB to a fileA in a transaction and then run fsync(fileB) in 
the same transaction, the 1GB from fileA is sent to disk (and waited on) 
before the fsync on fileB returns.

-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux