On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 04:38:02PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > I don't think there is a bug here. The 'wake_up_locked()' calls in epoll > are being protected by the ep->lock, not the wait_queue_head lock. So > arguably the 'annotation' is wrong, but I don't think there is a bug > beyond that. They can't be protected by ep->lock. The file might as well be watched for using poll or select as well, or just using epoll using another epoll fd.
