On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 11:42 -0300, Ernesto A. Fernández wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:57:46AM +0000, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Tue, 28/11/17, Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail > > .com> wrote: > > > > > > > > This does not link to the code > > > sample at all, in fact it links to a page > > > that links to a page that links to a page that > > > links to the pdf. > > > > I think this process is called bike-shedding - i.e. spending too > > much time arguing about trivial matters. The amount of (wasted) > > effort put into arguing about not providing pointers to relevant > > information. Please just put the relevant information in the next > > revision of the patch and re-submit. > Of course you ignored me, but I must insist: I would be far more > inclined > to take you seriously if you could just get your email client to send > replies correctly. And while you are at it, keep the lines under 80 > characters, will you? You cannot insist. Everybody has the right to do the things in own way. You are ignoring our opinions. Why do we need to change our opinions? Why do we need to take into account your vision? What's the point to consider you in a serious way if you treat us like the kids? By the way, my remarks are still the same. I don't agree this current state of the patch. The patch needs to be improved. Thanks, Vyacheslav Dubeyko.
