-------------------------------------------- On Tue, 28/11/17, Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is that necessary? I think people can find the > Unicode Standard on their > own. Even if I did > provide a link, it's a pdf, so people would still > need > to look up the right sections. It's > not going to save anybody much work. Yes, it is necessary. No, it is not a pdf. The code sample is inlined in the older version of this technical report: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/tr15-18.html#Hangul The code samples, etc had been splitted off and referenced in the current version: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/#Hangul_Composition Please: 1. include the above urls when you re-submit the next revision of the patch. 2. include a brief description of minimal example - e.g. touch "\xXX\xYY\xZZ..." to create a minimal empty file for testing, in the commit message. "People could look it up" is not an excuse not to give precise pointers to relevant information.
