Re: [PATCH] fs: handle shrinker registration failure in sget_userns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michal Hocko wrote:
> > @@ -260,9 +261,8 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags,
> >  	s->s_shrink.count_objects = super_cache_count;
> >  	s->s_shrink.batch = 1024;
> >  	s->s_shrink.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE | SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
> > -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_shrink.list);
> > -	return s;
> > -
> > +	if (register_shrinker(&s->s_shrink) == 0)
> > +		return s;
> >  fail:
> >  	destroy_unused_super(s);
> >  	return NULL;
> 
> But I am not sure this is correct. So what protects shrinker invocation
> while the object is not initialized yet?

Then, what protects shrinker invocation in your patch?
Your patch is calling register_shrinker() immediately after
alloc_super() succeeds. My patch just moved register_shrinker()
into alloc_super().

@@ -503,6 +512,10 @@ struct super_block *sget_userns(struct file_system_type *type,
 		s = alloc_super(type, (flags & ~SB_SUBMOUNT), user_ns);
 		if (!s)
 			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		if (register_shrinker(&s->s_shrink)) {
+			destroy_unused_super(s);
+			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		}
 		goto retry;
 	}
 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux