Re: [PATCH v2] fs/fcntl: restore checking against COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX for F_GETLK64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Layton писал 14.11.17 17:06:
...
 			break;
-		err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock);
+		err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock, COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX);

I think you want COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX here? In any case, I'm fine with the
first version, and just renaming the function. I'll plan to push that
one unless you have a reason that we should do it this way.
I would like send v3 with fix the typo you told me. As for me, it is more clean than two functions. Was I wrong with MessageId last time or it is ok to have a new thread for every patch version?


--
С уважением,
Виталий Липатов,
Etersoft




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux