Serge: > Right, but one will be preferred by the community - and while I have my > own preference, I wouldn't put too much faith on that, rather talk with > the apparmor folks, look over the lkml logs for previous submissions, > and then decide. Thanks for your advice. We got the same advice from Jonathan@LWN in Embedded Linux Conference 2007, and contacted AppArmor folks but no action occurred. We'll try to contact again. John Johansen: Both AppArmor and TOMOYO need vfsmount in LSM hooks. Although we suggested another solution in [TOMOYO #6], we can use AppArmor's approach. How about submitting only vfsmount patches before submitting AppArmor/TOMOYO main module? We think the patches relate to not only LSM folks but also fsdevel folks. So we are going to post the brief description of the patches to fsdevel. Regards, Kentaro Takeda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
