Re: [PATCH v2] fs: guard_bio_eod() needs to consider partitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Greg Edwards <gedwards@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: guard_bio_eod() needs to consider partitions
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:46:29 +0100
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20171024172148.12397-1-gedwards@ddn.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

This looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Jens, can you pick it up through the block tree given that is where
the issue was introduced?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] fs: guard_bio_eod() needs to consider partitions
  - From: Jens Axboe

References:
- [PATCH] fs: guard_bio_eod() needs to consider partitions
  - From: Greg Edwards
- [PATCH v2] fs: guard_bio_eod() needs to consider partitions
  - From: Greg Edwards

Prev by Date: Re: Kernel crash in free_pipe_info()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Improve fairness when locking the per-superblock s_anon list
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: guard_bio_eod() needs to consider partitions
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: guard_bio_eod() needs to consider partitions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux