On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:09:30PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:58:06 +0100 (CET) Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 17 2008 00:43, Karel Zak wrote: > > >> > > >> Seems like a plain bad idea to me. There will be any number of home-made > > >> /proc/mounts parsers and we don't know what they do. > > > > > > So, let's use /proc/mounts_v2 ;-) > > > > Was not it like "don't use /proc for new things"? > > Well yeah. If we're going to do a brand new mechanism to expose > per-mount data then we should hunker down and get it right. Which automatically means "no sysfs". We are NOT converting vfsmounts to kobject-based lifetime rules. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
