Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix out-of-free problem caused by atomic write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 04:30:19PM +0200, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 10/26, Yunlong Song wrote:
> > > f2fs_balance_fs only actives once in the commit_inmem_pages, but there
> > > are more than one page to commit, so all the other pages will miss the
> > > check. This will lead to out-of-free problem when commit a very large
> > > file. To fix it, we should do f2fs_balance_fs for each inmem page.
> > 
> > NAK, this breaks atomicity.
> 
> Can someone please explain (and write down in e.g. manpages) these
> atomicy rules?

The basic idea is to provide atomicity of blocks written by write(2) given
period managed by user. For example, user can do 1) ioctl to start a period,
2) write(2) calls, 3) ioctl to commit all the blocks. Then, filesystem will
guarantee committed blocks should be recovered all or nothing after power-cut.

Scenario #1:
 - ioctl(fd, F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE)
 - 0 = write(2)
 - ...
 - 0 = write(2)
 - ioctl(fd, F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE)

Scenario #2:
 - ioctl(fd, F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE)
 - 0 = write(2)
 - ...
 - err = write(2)
 - ioctl(fd, F2FS_IOC_ABORT_ATOMIC_WRITE)

Scenario #3:
 - ioctl(fd, F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE)
 - 0 = write(2)
 - ...
 - process crashed or close(fd)

Thanks,



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux