On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:52:38AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/ > > Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized. > v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9. > Looks like fun. btrfsck fails to check if it actually received a dev argument though, so if you don't pass a device, we get a nice segfault. Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kmcmartin@xxxxxxxxxx> --- diff -Nur btrfs-progs-0.10/btrfsck.c btrfs-progs-0.10-kyle/btrfsck.c --- btrfs-progs-0.10/btrfsck.c 2008-01-15 10:33:32.000000000 -0500 +++ btrfs-progs-0.10-kyle/btrfsck.c 2008-01-15 11:49:24.000000000 -0500 @@ -709,6 +709,11 @@ return err; } +void print_usage(void) { + fprintf(stderr, "usage: btrfsck dev\n"); + exit(1); +} + int main(int ac, char **av) { struct btrfs_root *root; struct cache_tree extent_cache; @@ -727,6 +732,9 @@ int slot; struct btrfs_root_item ri; + if (ac < 2) + print_usage(); + radix_tree_init(); cache_tree_init(&extent_cache); cache_tree_init(&seen); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
