On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:29:57PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Ok, I'd also like to kill DAX support in the brd driver. It's a source > of complexity and maintenance burden for zero benefit. It's the only > ->direct_access() implementation that sleeps and it's the only > implementation where there is a non-linear relationship between > sectors and pfns. Having a 1:1 sector to pfn relationship will help > with the dma-extent-busy management since we don't need to keep > calling into the driver to map pfns back to sectors once we know the > pfn[0] sector[0] relationship. But these are important things that other block devices may / will want. For example, I think it's entirely sensible to support ->direct_access for RAID-0. Dell are looking at various different options for having one pmemX device per DIMM and using RAID to lash them together. ->direct_access makes no sense for RAID-5 or RAID-1, but RAID-0 makes sense to me. Last time we tried to take sleeping out, there were grumblings from people with network block devices who thought they'd want to bring pages in across the network. I'm a bit less sympathetic to this because I don't know anyone actively working on it, but the RAID-0 case is something I think we should care about.
