Hi Changwei,
Could you share the method to reproduce the problem?
On 2017/10/17 14:48, Changwei Ge wrote:
> When a node dies, other live nodes have to choose a new master
> for an existed lock resource mastered by the dead node.
>
> As for ocfs2/dlm implementation, this is done by function -
> dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list which marks those lock rsources
> as DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING and manages them via a list from which
> DLM changes lock resource's master later.
>
> So without invoking dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list, no master will
> be choosed after dlm recovery accomplishment since no lock resource can
> be found through ::resource list.
>
> What's worse is that if DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING is not marked for
> lock resources mastered a dead node, it will break up synchronization
> among nodes.
>
> So invoke dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list again.
>
> Fixs: 'commit ee8f7fcbe638 ("ocfs2/dlm: continue to purge recovery
> lockres when recovery master goes down")'
>
> Reported-by: Vitaly Mayatskih <v.mayatskih@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
> index 74407c6..ec8f758 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
> @@ -2419,6 +2419,7 @@ static void dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup(struct
> dlm_ctxt *dlm, u8 dead_node)
> dlm_lockres_put(res);
> continue;
> }
> + dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list(dlm, res);
> } else if (res->owner == dlm->node_num) {
> dlm_free_dead_locks(dlm, res, dead_node);
> __dlm_lockres_calc_usage(dlm, res);
>
