On Fri 13-10-17 14:58:54, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:06:00PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > We return IOMAP_F_NEEDDSYNC flag from ext4_iomap_begin() for a > > synchronous write fault when inode has some uncommitted metadata > > changes. In the fault handler ext4_dax_fault() we then detect this case, > > call vfs_fsync_range() to make sure all metadata is committed, and call > > dax_insert_pfn_mkwrite() to insert page table entry. Note that this will > > also dirty corresponding radix tree entry which is what we want - > > fsync(2) will still provide data integrity guarantees for applications > > not using userspace flushing. And applications using userspace flushing > > can avoid calling fsync(2) and thus avoid the performance overhead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/ext4/file.c | 6 +++++- > > fs/ext4/inode.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > fs/jbd2/journal.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/jbd2.h | 1 + > > 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > <> > > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > > index 31db875bc7a1..13a198924a0f 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > > @@ -3394,6 +3394,19 @@ static int ext4_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t wait) > > } > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX > > +static bool ext4_inode_datasync_dirty(struct inode *inode) > > +{ > > + journal_t *journal = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal; > > + > > + if (journal) > > + return !jbd2_transaction_committed(journal, > > + EXT4_I(inode)->i_datasync_tid); > > + /* Any metadata buffers to write? */ > > + if (!list_empty(&inode->i_mapping->private_list)) > > + return true; > > + return inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC; > > +} > > I just had 2 quick questions on this: > > 1) Does ext4 actually use inode->i_mapping->private_list to keep track of > dirty metadata buffers? The comment above ext4_write_end() leads me to > believe that this list is unused? > > * ext4 never places buffers on inode->i_mapping->private_list. metadata > * buffers are managed internally. > > Or does the above comment only apply to ext4 with a journal? Yes, the above applies for ext4 with a journal. ext4 without a journal uses inode->i_mapping->private_list for metadata tracking. And DAX can be used without the journal just fine... > 2) Where is I_DIRTY_DATASYNC set in inode->i_state? I poked around a bit and > couldn't see it. Never directly (at least for ext4). But it will get set by mark_inode_dirty() as I_DIRTY contains I_DIRTY_DATASYNC. > The rest of the patch looks good to me, and you can add: > > Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR