Commit c87fb4a378f9 ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens") made the locks_in_grace() comment be in the wrong place. This patch move this comment just at the right place. Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfs_common/grace.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs_common/grace.c b/fs/nfs_common/grace.c index 519396967e79..c030cd618b99 100644 --- a/fs/nfs_common/grace.c +++ b/fs/nfs_common/grace.c @@ -55,13 +55,6 @@ locks_end_grace(struct lock_manager *lm) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(locks_end_grace); -/** - * locks_in_grace - * - * Lock managers call this function to determine when it is OK for them - * to answer ordinary lock requests, and when they should accept only - * lock reclaims. - */ static int __state_in_grace(struct net *net, bool open) { @@ -78,6 +71,13 @@ __state_in_grace(struct net *net, bool open) return false; } +/** + * locks_in_grace + * + * Lock managers call this function to determine when it is OK for them + * to answer ordinary lock requests, and when they should accept only + * lock reclaims. + */ int locks_in_grace(struct net *net) { return __state_in_grace(net, 0); -- 2.13.5