On Wed 2008-01-09 14:48:53, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > I'm not saying fuse is worthless. It is a nice toy for single-user > > systems. But I do not think we should be merging "allow ordinary users > > to mount their own fuse's" before issues above are fixed. > > I think multi user systems are not all that interesting. And I > suspect very few of them want reliably working suspend/hibernate > (which they wouldn't get due to other issues anyway), or have weird > shutdown scripts which stop when they are unable to umount > filesystems. Weird shutdown scripts? I believe all shutdown scripts have this issue -- if you want to [cleanly] unmount your / filesystem, you need all the opens for write closed, right...? Which self-deadlocked fused holding files open will prevent. > For paranoid sysadmins, I suggest not enabling fuse for unprivileged > users, which is pretty easy to do: just don't set /dev/fuse to be > world read-writable (which is the default BTW). > > So your reasons just don't warrant a big effort involving VFS hacking, > etc. Patches are of course welcome. Well, I believe code with obscure, but almost impossible to fix problems should not be merged... because that means it will not be fixed and we'll just have to live with broken kill -9 forever. Anyway, I believe it would be fair to mention kill -9 no longer working and shutdown/hibernation/multiuser problems it implies in the changelogs and probably sysctl documentation or how is this enabled. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
