Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, sysctl: make VM stats configurable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/15/2017 04:49 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Why do we need an auto-mode? Is it safe to enforce by default.

Do we *need* it?  Not really.

But, it does offer the best of both worlds: The vast majority of users
see virtually no impact from the counters.  The minority that do need
them pay the cost *and* don't have to change their tooling at all.

> Is it> possible that userspace can get confused to see 0 NUMA stats in
the
> first read while other allocation stats are non-zero?

I doubt it.  Those counters are pretty worthless by themselves.  I have
tooling that goes and reads them, but it aways displays deltas.  Read
stats, sleep one second, read again, print the difference.

The only scenario I can see mattering is someone who is seeing a
performance issue due to NUMA allocation misses (or whatever) and wants
to go look *back* in the past.

A single-time printk could also go a long way to keeping folks from
getting confused.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux