Rik van Riel wrote: > Al Boldi <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Has there been some thought about an incremental fsck? > > > > You know, somehow fencing a sub-dir to do an online fsck? > > Search for "chunkfs" Sure, and there is TileFS too. But why wouldn't it be possible to do this on the current fs infrastructure, using just a smart fsck, working incrementally on some sub-dir? Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
