On 2017/9/1 20:14, Yunlong Song wrote:
> se->ckpt_valid_blocks is always larger than se->valid_blocks, so
> get_ssr_cost can be cleared.
I think this is not correct.
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 11 +----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index cd147e7..b226760 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -277,20 +277,11 @@ static unsigned int get_greedy_cost(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> valid_blocks * 2 : valid_blocks;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int get_ssr_cost(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> - unsigned int segno)
> -{
> - struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
> -
> - return se->ckpt_valid_blocks > se->valid_blocks ?
> - se->ckpt_valid_blocks : se->valid_blocks;
> -}
> -
> static inline unsigned int get_gc_cost(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> unsigned int segno, struct victim_sel_policy *p)
> {
> if (p->alloc_mode == SSR)
> - return get_ssr_cost(sbi, segno);
> + return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks;
>
> /* alloc_mode == LFS */
> if (p->gc_mode == GC_GREEDY)
>
