On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 04:48:00PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Elena Reshetova >> <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Now we have at least x86 support for ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT merged and >> > arm and others on their way. >> > >> > Changes in v5: >> > * Kees catched that the following changes in >> > perf_event_context.refcount and futex_pi_state.refcount >> > are not correct now when ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT is enabled: >> > - WARN_ON(!atomic_inc_not_zero(refcount)); >> > + refcount_inc(refcount); >> > So they are now changed back to using refcount_inc_not_zero. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Andrew, are you able to carry these patches in -mm, since they span a >> bunch of core kernel areas? > > No.. these patches should go through the regular trees that maintain > these various parts. Okay, sounds fine. Elena, can you split these up? (You'll probably have to examine MAINTAINERS and/or git history for each patch...) -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
