Re: [PATCH v5] fs: Fix page cache inconsistency when mixing buffered and AIO DIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:52:45AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 02:10:47PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >> Al, would you mind taking this in through your tree?  It's been reviewed
> >> by myself and Jan in this mail thread.
> >
> > Still needs more fixing, I think?
> >
> > Sorry, this is the first time I've seen this patch....
> >
> >> > diff --git a/fs/iomap.c b/fs/iomap.c
> >> > index 1732228..144512e 100644
> >> > --- a/fs/iomap.c
> >> > +++ b/fs/iomap.c
> >> > @@ -713,8 +713,15 @@ struct iomap_dio {
> >> >  static ssize_t iomap_dio_complete(struct iomap_dio *dio)
> >> >  {
> >> >  	struct kiocb *iocb = dio->iocb;
> >> > +	struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
> >> >  	ssize_t ret;
> >> >  
> >> > +	if (!dio->error &&
> >> > +	    (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) && inode->i_mapping->nrpages)
> >> > +		invalidate_inode_pages2_range(inode->i_mapping,
> >> > +				iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> >> > +				(iocb->ki_pos + dio->size - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >> > +
> >> >  	if (dio->end_io) {
> >> >  		ret = dio->end_io(iocb,
> >> >  				dio->error ? dio->error : dio->size,
> >> 
> >
> > This invalidation is already run in iomap_dio_rw() for the sync IO
> > case directly after the call to iomap_dio_complete().  It also has a
> > comment to explain exactly why the the invalidation is needed, and
> > it issues a warning to dmesg if the invalidation fails to indicate
> > the reason why the user is reporting data corruption to us. i.e.:
> >
> > .....
> >         ret = iomap_dio_complete(dio);
> >
> >         /*
> >          * Try again to invalidate clean pages which might have been cached by
> >          * non-direct readahead, or faulted in by get_user_pages() if the source
> >          * of the write was an mmap'ed region of the file we're writing.  Either
> >          * one is a pretty crazy thing to do, so we don't support it 100%.  If
> >          * this invalidation fails, tough, the write still worked...
> >          */
> >         if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
> >                 int err = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
> >                                 start >> PAGE_SHIFT, end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >                 WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
> >         }
> >
> >         return ret;
> >
> > If we're going to replace this with an invalidation in
> > iomap_dio_complete() so it also handles the AIO path, then the
> > comment and warning on invalidation failure also need to be moved to
> > iomap_dio_complete() and the duplicate code removed from
> > iomap_dio_rw()...
> 
> Yep, good catch.  Lukas, care to respin?

Of course, I'll respin.

-Lukas

> 
> -Jeff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux