Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix some cases with reserved_blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Does this means the reserved_blocks cannot be used by users by can be used by filesystem? If it can be used by filesystem, then this cannot ensure the flash device really reserve the
reserved_blocks space, right? The reserved_blocks is just for users?

On 2017/8/8 14:08, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2017/8/8 12:12, Yunlong Song wrote:
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 3 ++-
  fs/f2fs/super.c    | 9 +++++----
  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index a3d0261..e288319 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ bool space_for_roll_forward(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
  {
  	s64 nalloc = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count);
- if (sbi->last_valid_block_count + nalloc > sbi->user_block_count)
+	if (sbi->last_valid_block_count + nalloc +
+			sbi->reserved_blocks > sbi->user_block_count)
I think we can treat reserved blocks as over-provision space in f2fs, so it
would be safe to store invalid data (may become valid during recovery) there.
Anyway, it OK to remain old condition judgment.

  		return false;
  	return true;
  }
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 4c1bdcb..c644bf5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -946,6 +946,7 @@ static int f2fs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
  	u64 id = huge_encode_dev(sb->s_bdev->bd_dev);
  	block_t total_count, user_block_count, start_count, ovp_count;
  	u64 avail_node_count;
+	block_t avail_user_block_count;
total_count = le64_to_cpu(sbi->raw_super->block_count);
  	user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count;
@@ -953,16 +954,16 @@ static int f2fs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
  	ovp_count = SM_I(sbi)->ovp_segments << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
  	buf->f_type = F2FS_SUPER_MAGIC;
  	buf->f_bsize = sbi->blocksize;
+	avail_user_block_count = user_block_count - sbi->reserved_blocks;
buf->f_blocks = total_count - start_count;
  	buf->f_bfree = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) + ovp_count;
-	buf->f_bavail = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) -
-						sbi->reserved_blocks;
+	buf->f_bavail = avail_user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi);
avail_node_count = sbi->total_node_count - F2FS_RESERVED_NODE_NUM; - if (avail_node_count > user_block_count) {
-		buf->f_files = user_block_count;
+	if (avail_node_count > avail_user_block_count) {
Likewise f_blocks calculation, the f_files one doesn't need to consider
reserved_blocks.

Thanks,

+		buf->f_files = avail_user_block_count;
  		buf->f_ffree = buf->f_bavail;
  	} else {
  		buf->f_files = avail_node_count;


.


--
Thanks,
Yunlong Song





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux