On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Yeah, I'm open to whatever. It's not clear where it should go, but if >> you want to take it and Linus doesn't want it "early", that works for >> me. Linus, Andrew, thoughts? > > I'd actually like this to go in separately from all the other security stuff. > > And I just checked this on a separate branch, just because I wanted to > see what the overall diff was. There's a conflict with apparmor > already - the resolution looks fairly straightforward, but considering > the area this touches, it would probably be good that Kees keeps this > branch and verifies things like that. Do you want me to carry this for -next and send it as a distinct pull request for v4.14? -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
