On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:55:36PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > +int file_write_and_wait(struct file *file) > +{ > + int err = 0, err2; > + struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping; > + > + if ((!dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrpages) || > + (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional)) { Since patch 1 exists, shouldn't this use the new helper? > + err = filemap_fdatawrite(mapping); > + /* See comment of filemap_write_and_wait() */ > + if (err != -EIO) { > + loff_t i_size = i_size_read(mapping->host); > + > + if (i_size != 0) > + __filemap_fdatawait_range(mapping, 0, > + i_size - 1); > + } > + } > + err2 = file_check_and_advance_wb_err(file); > + if (!err) > + err = err2; > + return err; Would this be clearer written as: if (err) return err; return err2; or even ... return err ? err : err2;