On Wed 28-06-17 16:01:50, Ross Zwisler wrote: > Another major change is that we remove dax_pfn_mkwrite() from our fault > flow, and instead rely on the page fault itself to make the PTE dirty and > writeable. The following description from the patch adding the > vm_insert_mixed_mkwrite() call explains this a little more: > > *** > To be able to use the common 4k zero page in DAX we need to have our PTE > fault path look more like our PMD fault path where a PTE entry can be > marked as dirty and writeable as it is first inserted, rather than > waiting for a follow-up dax_pfn_mkwrite() => finish_mkwrite_fault() call. > > Right now we can rely on having a dax_pfn_mkwrite() call because we can > distinguish between these two cases in do_wp_page(): > > case 1: 4k zero page => writable DAX storage > case 2: read-only DAX storage => writeable DAX storage > > This distinction is made by via vm_normal_page(). vm_normal_page() > returns false for the common 4k zero page, though, just as it does for > DAX ptes. Instead of special casing the DAX + 4k zero page case, we will > simplify our DAX PTE page fault sequence so that it matches our DAX PMD > sequence, and get rid of dax_pfn_mkwrite() completely. > > This means that insert_pfn() needs to follow the lead of insert_pfn_pmd() > and allow us to pass in a 'mkwrite' flag. If 'mkwrite' is set > insert_pfn() will do the work that was previously done by wp_page_reuse() > as part of the dax_pfn_mkwrite() call path. > *** Hum, thinking about this in context of this patch... So what if we have allocated storage, a process faults it read-only, we map it to page tables writeprotected. Then the process writes through mmap to the area - the code in handle_pte_fault() ends up in do_wp_page() if I'm reading it right. Then, since we are missing ->pfn_mkwrite() handlers, the PTE will be marked writeable but radix tree entry stays clean - bug. Am I missing something? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
