Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iomap: Switch from blkno to physical offset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maybe diskaddr or just addr instead of physical which sounds a little
confusing?

Also how well was this tested?  With all the calculation I'm a little
worried about overflows, so a full xfstests run including sub-page
blocksize and DAX really is in order here.

> +#define IOMAP_F_INLINE	0x40	/* data mixed with metadata */

data inline in the inode?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux