On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> uaccess str...() dead code removals.
Side note: you left a couple of references to strlen_user() still in the tree.
None of them *matter* (two comments and one declaration for the
function that no longer exists), but it just strikes me as a bit of an
odd oversight.
Are those removals perhaps in other trees (and you didn't want to
clash) or was it literally just "oops, I caught almost everything
except for those three cases"?
Linus
