Re: [PATCH] f2fs: no need to create issue_discard_thread if it exists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Yunlong,

It looks there is no way to create discard thread redundantly,
so here we don't need to check this?

Thanks,

On 2017/7/6 19:05, Yunlong Song wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 4c246e3..b48d004 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1417,6 +1417,8 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  
>  	if (SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info) {
>  		dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> +		if (dcc->f2fs_issue_discard)
> +			return err;
>  		goto init_thread;
>  	}
>  
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux