Re: [proposal] making filesystem tools more machine friendly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:17:17 +0200
Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:

> A structured output is something we should aim for. It helps a lot
> with the issues and it is the cheapest option. If it goes well, it can
> be later on followed by creating a library, although, at this moment,
> that seems a premature thing strive for. Creating a daemon is not a
> thing any single filesystem should do on its own.
> 
> And thank you for reading all this, I look forward to your
> comments. :-)

The whole concept seems a noble endeavour, I'm a bit wary of the
possibility to convince all the teams in charge to adhere to it
however... But that looks like a good idea for sure :)

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpeNP34lyDyD.pgp
Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux