Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 07:56:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:40:33 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > oops, that was me manually fixing rejects - I missed a bit.
> >
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_allocc-eliminate-unsigned-confusion-in-__rmqueue_fallback-fix
> > +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@ static bool unreserve_highatomic_pageblo
> > * condition simpler.
> > */
> > static inline bool
> > -__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int start_migratetype)
> > +__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype)
> > {
> > struct free_area *area;
> > int current_order;
> > _
> >
>
> I have pushed that into the original patch in linux-next for today.
But I guess that is irrelevant now :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
