Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] fs: enhanced writeback error reporting with errseq_t (pile #1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jeff,

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:23:46 -0400 Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If there are no major objections to this set, I'd like to have
> linux-next start picking it up to get some wider testing. What's the
> right vehicle for this, given that it touches stuff all over the tree?
> 
> I can see 3 potential options:
> 
> 1) I could just pull these into the branch that Stephen is already
> picking up for file-locks in my tree
> 
> 2) I could put them into a new branch, and have Stephen pull that one in
> addition to the file-locks branch
> 
> 3) It could go in via someone else's tree entirely (Andrew or Al's
> maybe?)
> 
> I'm fine with any of these. Anyone have thoughts?

Given that this is a one off development, either 1 or 3 (in Al's tree)
would be fine.  2 is a possibility (but people forget to ask me to
remove one shot trees :-()

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux