Re: [PATCH 04/11] fs: add support for allowing applications to pass in write life time hints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 09:59:38AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> Did you see v5? It adds enum write_hint and passes it all the way down,
> >> until we transform them into rq/bio flags.
> > 
> > Yes.  But with all the way down I mean all the way down to the driver :)
> 
> Only missing part is the request flags. And why make that any different
> than the flags we already have now? It'd be trivial to pack the value
> into the request flags as well, but I'm struggling to see the point of
> that, honestly.
> 
> Please expand on why you think changing the request flags to also
> carry that value would be useful, as opposed to just mapping it when
> we setup the request. If you have a valid concern I don't mind making
> the change, but I just don't see one right now.

Mostly so that we can pass the value down in one form through the whole
stack.

> How so? It's pretty straight forward. The only downside I see is that
> we'll have a delay between seeing the first valid write hint and to
> the time when nvme has it enabled. But that's so short, and in the
> grander scheme of things, doesn't matter one bit.

I'll take your word for that.  To be honest I hope future standards
won't make the mistake to come up with something as ugly as streams
and just take something like our hints on a per-I/O basis..




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux