Re: [git pull] first batch of ufs fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 06:03:24AM -0700, Richard Narron wrote:

> 2) After creating a new filesystem on FreeBSD, then on Linux copying a
> larger than 2GB file and creating a directory, the fsck back on FreeBSD
> looks ok.
> 
> But after going back to Linux and removing the large file and removing the
> directory, the fsck on FreeBSD looks not so good:

What happens is ufs_evict_inode() buggering off without syncing the inode
in case of final removal.  Incremental on top of that branch is
diff --git a/fs/ufs/inode.c b/fs/ufs/inode.c
index 34f11cf0900a..da553ffec85b 100644
--- a/fs/ufs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/inode.c
@@ -848,6 +848,7 @@ void ufs_evict_inode(struct inode * inode)
 		    (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
 		     S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
 			ufs_truncate_blocks(inode);
+		ufs_update_inode(inode, inode_needs_sync(inode));
 	}
 
 	invalidate_inode_buffers(inode);

Committed and pushed out...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux