Some filesystems set MNT_* flags in superblock->s_flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 	* what the hell is ms_flags thing doing in __vfs_new_sb_config()?
> It's a really vile mix of unrelated flags and operations we had in existing
> mount(2) ABI.  With MS_KERNMOUNT thrown into that loo^Wmix.  Sure, we need
> to parse the garbage fed to mount(2).  And we need to pass that garbage to
> "legacy" types as well, but let's not inflict it upon the new mechanisms.

Hmmm...  Some ->remount_fs() operations attempt to alter the MS_* flags that
correspond to MNT_* flags.  Coda, for example:

	static int coda_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
	{
		sync_filesystem(sb);
		*flags |= MS_NOATIME;
		return 0;
	}

But this is quashed in do_remount_sb:

	sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~MS_RMT_MASK) | (flags & MS_RMT_MASK);

And others set them directly in s_flags, v9fs_fill_super() for example sets
MS_NOATIME:

	sb->s_flags |= MS_ACTIVE | MS_DIRSYNC | MS_NOATIME;

I'm guessing things like this should be got rid of, but does there need to be
a way to inform mount() that these should be set on the vfsmount?

David



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux