Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Make containers kernel objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Aleksa Sarai <asarai@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> The reason I think this is necessary is that the kernel has no idea
> >> how to direct upcalls to what userspace considers to be a container -
> >> current Linux practice appears to make a "container" just an
> >> arbitrarily chosen junction of namespaces, control groups and files,
> >> which may be changed individually within the "container".
> 
> Just want to point out that if the kernel APIs for containers massively
> change, then the OCI will have to completely rework how we describe containers
> (and so will all existing runtimes).
> 
> Not to mention that while I don't like how hard it is (from a runtime
> perspective) to actually set up a container securely, there are undoubtedly
> benefits to having namespaces split out. The network namespace being separate
> means that in certain contexts you actually don't want to create a new network
> namespace when creating a container.

Yep, I quite agree.

However, certain things need to be made per-net namespace that *aren't*.  DNS
results, for instance.

As an example, I could set up a client machine with two ethernet ports, set up
two DNS+NFS servers, each of which think they're called "foo.bar" and attach
each server to a different port on the client machine.  Then I could create a
pair of containers on the client machine and route the network in each
container to a different port.  Now there's a problem because the names of the
cached DNS records for each port overlap.

Further, the NFS idmapper needs to be able to direct its calls to the
appropriate network.

> I had some ideas about how you could implement bridging in userspace (as an
> unprivileged user, for rootless containers) but if you can't join namespaces
> individually then such a setup is not practically possible.

I'm not proposing to take away the ability to arbitrarily set the namespaces
in a container.  I haven't implemented it yet, but it was on the to-do list:

 (7) Directly set a container's namespaces to allow cross-container
     sharing.

David



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux