On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 10:56 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:57:24AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > I reviewed the entire series. You may add > > Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > to any of the patches as you see fit. > > Thanks, done! Similar from my side, FWIW: Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Now let's talk about how this is going to be merged. > > Do you intend to send Linus a pull request? > > Yes, that might be the best idea. I'm also contemplating listing > me plus anyone volunteering (you?, Andy) as maintaines for the uuid > code. I would agree to be a designated reviewer for now (too many stuff to follow as a (co-)maintainer). > > The reason I am asking is because this last removal patch should > > probably > > be applied near the end of the merge window (?). > > Because maintainers cannot apply patches with code that uses the new > > uuid_t to linux-next branches and we don't want linux-next build to > > fail > > with new code that uses uuid_be... > > Yeah, we can probably defer that one for now. I would also like to append some of patches from my side, though they are WIP. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy
