On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:10:53PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> +static inline loff_t page_cache_mask(struct address_space *a)
> +{
> + return (loff_t)PAGE_MASK;
> +}
A tiny question: Why choose loff_t instead of 'unsigned long'?
It's not obvious because page_cache_mask() is not referenced in this
patchset at all ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
